You point out the 'terrorist government' in Gaza. The 'corrupt' government in the West Bank. Why should we look at these as less legitimate that the government

You point out the 'terrorist government' in Gaza. The 'corrupt' government in the West Bank. Why should we look at these as less legitimate that the government that the UN has concluded has committed four of the five genocidal acts defined under international law? And what hope does the Palestinian Authority really have in the West Bank when they continue to be under occupation and the Israeli govern covertly and overtly supports illegal settlements? Finally - how can you look down on Gaza/West Bank as 'not legitimate' states when large parts of the state of Israel were taken through their own terrorism and invasion of their neighbours. That seems to be easily forgotten. They're 'legitimate' only because they've been backed by a superpower.