3 ms·

It's literally a quote from the article, though?

• firesteelrain 1y ago
  The point is the article is burying the lede rather than upfront framing it in a different manner. It is easy to miss. Edit: I am responding to the critique of a different person. I did read the article.
  • Klonoar 1y ago
    You can just admit you didn’t read the article.
    • firesteelrain 1y ago
      I wasn’t the GP
    • dh2022 1y ago
      I proudly admit I do not read the Guardian on principle.
      • parados 1y ago
        Would you care to share those principles?
        • dh2022 1y ago
          Wrapping a tiny bit of truth in innuendoes and click-bait titles with anti-corporate bent. Like for example this article. Free press and all, I guess.
          • parados 1y ago
            Those are your principles?
            • dh2022 1y ago
              Sorry, my post was confusing. Those are the principles of The Guardian. My principle is to avoid The Guardian.
              • parados 1y ago
                Got it. Thanks.
• cm2012 1y ago
  Didn't mean to imply is isn't in the article. I came to commentary after seeing the headline. Usually on HN there is a comment that shows why the headline is misleading in some way.
  • input_sh 1y ago
    It's an open secret that many people here don't read past the headline before commenting, but being open about it and proudly stating it is certainly... an interesting choice on your part.