Which is perhaps also why: > An MP has claimed in parliament that Mark Zuckerberg’s company was trying to “silence and punish” Sarah Wynn-Williams By doing so

Which is perhaps also why: > An MP has claimed in parliament that Mark Zuckerberg’s company was trying to “silence and punish” Sarah Wynn-Williams By doing so in parliament they have immunity (presumably the worry would be defamation) for pushing this, true or false. I'm not much of a Meta fan, but there seems to be less to this story every paragraph you read of the article.