3 ms·
It's the standard. Opposition to GitHub tends to be on moral grounds, rather than the product itself.
by tetrisgm 1y ago
It's the standard. Opposition to GitHub tends to be on moral grounds, rather than the product itself.
- 28304283409234 1y agoOh, it's the standard everyone. Let's go home. We can't possibly deviate from the standard, especially as founders of startups, and hackers. /s
- xigoi 1y agoOn technical grounds, the UI is broken and slow as fuck.
- ranger_danger 1y agoweird, I've never had a single problem with it and I don't know anyone else who has
- xigoi 1y agoProblems I’ve encountered recently: • Pages often take tens of seconds to load, even on a stable internet connection. • Using the back/forward buttons takes a few seconds and if I click them several times, it results in the page shown not matching the URL bar. • If I click an anchor link and then press the back button, it does not send me back. (Very annoying when reading READMEs and using table-of-contents links.)
- zzo38computer 1y agoIf you disable the JavaScripts provided by GitHub and implement your own instead, then it works better, in my experience.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- tetrisgm 1y agoIs gitlab better in some ways?
- xigoi 1y agoGitLab is just as bad. I personally use SourceHut, but Forgejo also seems fine.