.. and yet if you are to believe the NY Times (I also read something from Google that says the same thing, but was unable to find the link) that TV will be dwar

.. and yet if you are to believe the NY Times (I also read something from Google that says the same thing, but was unable to find the link) that TV will be dwarfed by people using the internet in the not too distant future. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/25/technology/25drill.html?_r=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&oref=slogin http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/25/technology/25drill.html?_r... Then again, Nielsen shows that the average American household watches significantly more TV than uses the internet? http://www.nielsen.com/media/2008/pr_081124.html http://www.nielsen.com/media/2008/pr_081124.html I'd say that while this might be currently true - given the shift in eyeballs from the TV to the Computer Screen amongst the younger people, then costs for content producers should invariably become lower as time marches on - so cuban's point is a bit of a moot point.