3 ms·
Exactly right. Each of these is just obviously wrong. Leaders Overshare? Simon shares material non-public information on linkedin. Now he and the company ar
by aeternum 1y ago
Exactly right. Each of these is just obviously wrong.
Leaders Overshare? Simon shares material non-public information on linkedin. Now he and the company are in trouble.
Leaders bend the rules? Simon bent the rules for some of his team but not others, now multiple past employees are bringing discrimination lawsuits.
Leaders coach and help people land softly? Simon kept too many low performers on his team and now the company's product is buggy, behind competitors and forced to downsize so his entire team is being cut.
- otherme123 1y ago> Leaders Overshare? Simon shares material non-public information on linkedin. Now he and the company are in trouble. I think this is within the team. Maybe you never worked for someone who doesn't share, who keep secrets, within the team. I did. It is frustrating. It makes you doubt every word they say, even a simple "everything is going fine" sows doubt in you, making you wonder if they are hidding bad news. It makes you doubt what you are doing is useful, because some time ago they hide a change of focus for weeks. Then the secrets are revealed, they are stupid and pointless (not industrial secrets like you imply), they kept it secret just in case.
- hackable_sand 1y agoWoah what bizarro world do you come from?
- squigz 1y agoI like the complete lack of nuance in this and other responses. Like yeah, obviously what they meant was oversharing internal information publicly.
- cutemonster 1y agoSometimes people want to interpret what others say in the dumbest way possible, to get something to criticize and seem smart themselves?