> Absence of evidence is not evidence for absence. which do you believe is the right default position to have: a) nothing, unless something is proven, OR b)

> Absence of evidence is not evidence for absence. which do you believe is the right default position to have: a) nothing, unless something is proven, OR b) something, unless nothing is proven it seems to me that (a) is the more prudent stance and hence much more likely to be correct.