3 ms·

> was a claim that Charlie Kirk’s assassin was a “maga” supporter. I just watched the video. What he said was that MAGA supporters were too quick to blame any

> was a claim that Charlie Kirk’s assassin was a “maga” supporter. I just watched the video. What he said was that MAGA supporters were too quick to blame anyone but the right, before there was any evidence about the shooter’s identity or political stance. That’s a fact.

thepasswordis 1y ago
[flagged]
- CamperBob2 1y ago
  [flagged]
- autoexec 1y ago
  It's 100% true that MAGA people were being very vocal all over social media trying to characterize him as not being a trump supporter. What part of that do you think was a lie?
- scheeseman486 1y ago
  How is it false? It isn't making the claim that the shooter was MAGA, but commenting on the right wing influencer sphere's recurring habit of accusing mass shooters of being associated with any group other than themselves.
- gricardo99 1y ago
  he’s clearly commenting on how the “maga gang” is characterizing the murderer. There’s no statement directly about the murderer.
fakeBeerDrinker 1y ago
[flagged]
- scheeseman486 1y ago
  > "anything other than one of them" can very easily be interpreted in two ways, one of them leading a person to believe that the adult (not a kid) was somehow "MAGA" Anything can be interpreted in any way you want as long as you're arguing in bad faith > at the very least, the situation as tense as it was (is?), Jimmy could have chosen to leave it alone for a bit - why say that MAGA is trying to "score political points" at this time? Why not consider that many people are genuinely grieving and upset? lmao, no one, right wing influencers nor the government, is doing this. > ABC fired his butt, not the FCC or anyone else. A sternly worded message from the FCC chairman doesn't make a company like DIS fire someone unless it is convenient for DIS. That's a fact. It isn't "a fact". If a mob goon threatens action on an employer unless that employer punishes an employee, who the hell do you think is actually responsible?
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]

thepasswordis 1y ago

[flagged]

CamperBob2 1y ago
[flagged]
autoexec 1y ago
It's 100% true that MAGA people were being very vocal all over social media trying to characterize him as not being a trump supporter. What part of that do you think was a lie?
scheeseman486 1y ago
How is it false? It isn't making the claim that the shooter was MAGA, but commenting on the right wing influencer sphere's recurring habit of accusing mass shooters of being associated with any group other than themselves.
gricardo99 1y ago
he’s clearly commenting on how the “maga gang” is characterizing the murderer. There’s no statement directly about the murderer.

fakeBeerDrinker 1y ago

[flagged]

scheeseman486 1y ago
> "anything other than one of them" can very easily be interpreted in two ways, one of them leading a person to believe that the adult (not a kid) was somehow "MAGA" Anything can be interpreted in any way you want as long as you're arguing in bad faith > at the very least, the situation as tense as it was (is?), Jimmy could have chosen to leave it alone for a bit - why say that MAGA is trying to "score political points" at this time? Why not consider that many people are genuinely grieving and upset? lmao, no one, right wing influencers nor the government, is doing this. > ABC fired his butt, not the FCC or anyone else. A sternly worded message from the FCC chairman doesn't make a company like DIS fire someone unless it is convenient for DIS. That's a fact. It isn't "a fact". If a mob goon threatens action on an employer unless that employer punishes an employee, who the hell do you think is actually responsible?

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]