4 ms·
The problem here is that you're talking about the comments on the submission, whereas I was not. I'm talking about the upvotes on the submission. It's entirely
by lapcat 1y ago
The problem here is that you're talking about the comments on the submission, whereas I was not. I'm talking about the upvotes on the submission.
It's entirely expected and unsurprising that Apple's announcement of a major macOS release would receive a ton of upvotes, regardless of how people feel about the release. That's why I think your analogy is irrelevant.
A low quality submission should not receive many upvotes, and as a consequence, it should not receive many comments of any kind, positive or negative, because it won't appear on the front page of HN for people to notice and comment on it.
- _2d30 1y ago> The problem here is that you're talking about the comments on the submission, whereas I was not. I'm talking about the upvotes on the submission. I think the idea that one behavior being used as evidence for another behavior is problematic is ridiculous.