4 ms·
Don't write long blog posts about how your country doesn't have enough white people (and should start deporting brown people) and you won't be called a white su
by cogman10 1y ago
Don't write long blog posts about how your country doesn't have enough white people (and should start deporting brown people) and you won't be called a white supremist. Pretty simple.
- bigstrat2003 1y agoOr maybe don't call someone names corresponding to behavior that they haven't endorsed.
- cogman10 1y ago[flagged]
- 15155 1y ago[flagged]
- cogman10 1y ago[flagged]
- 15155 1y ago[flagged]
- cogman10 1y agoThe real question is who isn't American? When someone says "X is for Xes" they are implicitly saying "and not for Ys". If you don't believe that's the case, then tell me exactly what that phrase means other than to exclude some group. To claim "these are not real Americans".
- 15155 1y agoTotally dodging the issue. You claimed "white supremacist" was an accurate title, cited Nazis who invaded other countries and eradicated the local culture/population/racial groups without assimilating (eerily similar to mass immigration), and then immediately moved the goalposts when it was illustrated how ignorant such a statement could be. > who isn't American? Is this a trick question? People who were not born in America are clearly not American, save for naturalized citizens and a handful of other caveats. If you were born in Iceland, Greenland, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark (just picking some traditionally/predominantly-white countries to really drive it home) and are not the child of a diplomat or even a citizen: you are not American. Seriously: do you believe you are Japanese? If you actually are Japanese, do you think you're Peruvian, too? Are you also a Liechtensteiner? People are citizens of specific nations, believe it or not - this is not some new, misunderstood concept. > means other than to exclude some group Why is it a foregone conclusion that exclusion is automatically unjust? Are countries not permitted to exclude people? Again: this is not based on race. Does one have an automatic right to immigrate wherever they please?
- mijoharas 1y agoDHH complains about people that aren't "White British" in the article[0]. If he were talking about foreign born he would say "only 65% are native Brits" [1]. You may not think that nationality is equivalent to race, but DHH does in the article you're referencing. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45303305 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45303305 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45303447 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45303447