3 ms·
You seem to have misunderstood what Google Labs was. It was not an organization doing basic research. It was (crappy) infrastructure for making neat little expe
by jsnell 14y ago
You seem to have misunderstood what Google Labs was. It was not an organization doing basic research. It was (crappy) infrastructure for making neat little experiments available to the public without making them production quality.
- antidoh 14y agoYes, I thought of it as a cross between beta testing and A/B testing. Or throwing spaghetti on the wall and seeing what sticks. Certainly not basic or serious research, which is probably going on right now somewhere in Google.
- additive 14y agoYeah, I knew that. I didn't mean to imply it was a separate entity for doing basic research. What I meant was the fact they closed it seemed to suggest that the idea of research for its own sake is not really somethng Google is interested in. At least, that how it looks from outside the Googleplex. Inside it may look different. (And yes, I am aware that employees are allowed to publish. But that research is almost always for the ultimate purpose of furthering ad sales, though it may not be immediately obvious to the outside observer.) It's also interesting how Google employees, at least the ones who post on HN, seem to be isolated from what is going on elsewhere in the company. Is there cross-pollination between functional groups within Google? Great research organisations often have this quality. (Prepare for waxing poetic from young Google employees who think they are changing the world...)
- zem 14y ago"labs" was an unfortunate name, google labs was about product experiments rather than basic research. what you want is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_X_Lab http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_X_Lab, whence emerged (in the "what has google done for us lately" department) the self-driving car and the augmented-reality glasses.