4 ms·
You might be more willing if you see it as a kind of reciprocity, your part in a scheme which allows you to hike or otherwise relax on land other than your own.
by dvdkon 1y ago
You might be more willing if you see it as a kind of reciprocity, your part in a scheme which allows you to hike or otherwise relax on land other than your own.
And even if you never set foot on other's people property, I think it's fair of the government, which ultimately enforces land owners' property rights, to say that they won't support you excluding other people from natural land.
- dyauspitr 1y agoHonestly in the US it has never been a problem since there is so much land. The laws are also unambiguous here. If I’m on someone’s property I can get shot but on public land we can shoot each other :)
- dvdkon 1y agoI have to admit that Americans seem to have a different perspective on land use, with the sheer scale of the country and a willingness to drive for hours to get places. If someone told me that I have to travel from Prague to Germany to go hiking or even just let my kids play in a forest, I'd be pretty mad.
- dyauspitr 1y agoIn rural areas many Americans can go on a hike or play in the forest in their backyard.
- dvdkon 1y agoMost Americans live in urban areas, though. I have to say that according to this PDF I found [1], a lot more US families do own forested land, but it's still a minority. [1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20250420022718/http://www.familyforestresearchcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/03familyforestowners.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20250420022718/http://www.family...