4 ms·
Over 500PB of data, wow. Would love to know how and why "statistical models that produce price forecasts for over 50,000 financial instruments worldwide" requir
by rickette 1y ago
Over 500PB of data, wow. Would love to know how and why "statistical models that produce price forecasts for over 50,000 financial instruments worldwide" require that much storage.
- Beijinger 1y agoMe too. Is is really hard for me to understand, what XTX is actually doing. Trading? VC? AI/ML? Have you seen their portfolio? PS: Company seems legit. Impressive growth. But I still don't understand what they are doing. Provide "electronic liquidity". Well....
- guerby 1y agoIf you keep all order book changes for a large number of financial instruments volume adds up quickly.
- rickette 1y agoWould that kind of data not compress like crazy? Or would they need to keep all that data hot and fast.
- guerby 1y agoFrom just a single exchange you can reach up to 1 million messages of order book change per second https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/snippets/inet2.html https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/snippets/inet2.html Message Volume 1,684,103,265 Messages per Second 1,134,640 Order Volume 871,875,595 Orders per Second 581,696 Share Volume 12,814,454,760 Executions per Second 193,350 Also if you look at equity derivative products which have parameters like type call/put, strike, maturity can be hundreds of financial products for one underlying stock. I worked in this sector and volume of data is a real challenge, no wonder you often get custom software to handle that :)
- rickette 1y agoThanks for the insight!
- pcthrowaway 1y agoHow do you propose lossless compression for all orderbook data? Of course if you are willing to lose granularity/information, it can be compressed a lot
- taneliv 1y agoI would imagine to lesser extent government policy changes and news articles, and to larger extent online discussions on topics relevant to these instruments. Models then attempt to extract signals with predictive value from all the noise. Probably contains non-trivial amount of history to correlate words to market performance in the past, say 20 years or more. But it's really just a guess, I haven't worked in this domain.