4 ms·
You really have to both listen and understand. The plausibility is that the Palestinians have a right to be protected from Genocide. Which is why the court is
by mpweiher 1y ago
You really have to both listen and understand.
The plausibility is that the Palestinians have a right to be protected from Genocide.
Which is why the court is hearing the case.
There was no decision on the plausibility of Israel infringing on that right, which is what you incorrectly make out of it.
To quote: "It did not decide that the claim of genocide was plausible".
Which is the exact opposite of what you are claiming.
https://x.com/mr_andrew_fox/status/1783621258032136550?s=61 https://x.com/mr_andrew_fox/status/1783621258032136550?s=61
- dmbche 1y agoSince when are the palestinians exempt from human rights? I don't think you understand this as well as you think.
- mpweiher 1y agoWho said they were? Except you? Complete straw man.
- dmbche 1y ago> The plausibility is that the Palestinians have a right to be protected from Genocide. This sentence presupposes they could be exempt that right
- dotancohen 1y agoThe ones who made that statement which you object to, were the judges on the case brought forward by the South Africans. It was not Israel nor anybody representing Israel.
- mpweiher 1y agoNope.