3 ms·
correct me if i'm wrong, but qt4.x should happily coexist with qt5.x, providing all the legacy support the author might require. i'd be surprised if qt4 didn't
by zem 14y ago
correct me if i'm wrong, but qt4.x should happily coexist with qt5.x, providing all the legacy support the author might require. i'd be surprised if qt4 didn't get backported fixes and possibly even features from the 5.x branch, especially if a lot of popular apps end up still depending on it.
- stevenlstarr 14y agoThere not planning to replace the QX11Info() class the removed and independent had to start coding a replacement and apparently he needs help. The XCB docs/tutorials are almost non-existent and do to that I never bothered to pick it up so I cant help him. You don't remove a class like that and not tell any one or provide a replacement. Its rude. They didn't bother to take consideration for those that were using those api's. Now all my codes broken and I have to hope that guy writing the XCB QX11Info() class for the xcb comes threw or I have to replace thousands of lines of code.