3 ms·
In that case, going by the FCC's complaint against Kimmel, I wonder if my pointing out that Trump furthermore skipped Kirk's vigil to go golfing, is similarly "
by mrtesthah 1y ago
In that case, going by the FCC's complaint against Kimmel, I wonder if my pointing out that Trump furthermore skipped Kirk's vigil to go golfing, is similarly "too offensive to be protected by the first amendment"?
https://people.com/donald-trump-misses-charlie-kirk-vigil-11810283 https://people.com/donald-trump-misses-charlie-kirk-vigil-11...
- davesque 1y agoBy this precedent, it would be!
- dylan604 1y agoBut mrtesthah has no audience that makes him dangerous to the establishment. He's just a random voice in the wind.
- Rapzid 1y agoI wouldn't go posting about that under your real name unless you want people pressuring your company to fire you on Twitter.. What a time.
- mrtesthah 1y agoThe number one rule of fascism is to not comply in advance. Speak out loudly and use your rights; force them to take action to stop you.
- sigwinch 1y agoIt was the FCC opportunistically gaining a precedent that they’ll use on other observational hosts. If it wasn’t this, it would have been leaks on Epstein.
- mrtesthah 1y agoThey realized Kirk as an opportunity because their base was emotionally activated about it and screaming for blood.