3 ms·
Well, one huge difference is that the UN was allowed to set up camps for refugees during the Mosul offensive. In Gaza, people are just herded from one kill box
by actionfromafar 1y ago
Well, one huge difference is that the UN was allowed to set up camps for refugees during the Mosul offensive.
In Gaza, people are just herded from one kill box to another, back and forth.
- tguvot 1y agoi believe official un position about setting any refugee camps in gaza it's that it will be forced displacement of population. or something like this. going back to days when Israel setup camps for evacuation of population from Rafah. I don't remember UN asking to setup refugee camps or helping them to evacuate out of war zone and you ignored the middle, which says that IDF using same procedures like USA (and in other words entire NATO)
- snapplebobapple 1y agowhose fault is that though? It's not the Israeli's fault the surrounding countries are blocking refugees and it's certainly not their fault that the terrorist's strategy depends on a large civilian population acting as a shield. It's a rock and a hard place situation because the whole area pretty clearly needs to be pacified from anyone sane living in Israel's perspective, as the raping, pillaging and murder orchestrated against israel that started this latest campaign can not be allowed to happen again and from the Hamas position their whole goal is to exist and cause atrocities against the Israelis until they leave. This all seems like a very measured response given the reality of the situation.