5 ms·
> Source: Hagger et (63!) al. 2016 I can't help chuckling at the idea that over 1.98 * 10^87 people were involved in the paper.
by Terr_ 1y ago
> Source: Hagger et (63!) al. 2016
I can't help chuckling at the idea that over 1.98 * 10^87 people were involved in the paper.
- dlcarrier 1y agoIf you were to meet a "normal" person, would you interpret that as meaning "perpendicular" or as meaning "the kind of person that doesn't look at everything like it's a mathematical expression"?
- Terr_ 1y agoNormal: "The kind of person who doesn't go out of their way to put-down other people on HN for being nerdy when a linked article contains a weird editorial interjection that bears an unusual resemblance to a math expression."
- recursive 1y agoUm, actually, the interpretation here is "factorial", not "perpendicular".