4 ms·
> It’s worrying to me that Anthropic, a foreign corporation, would even have the visibility necessary to enforce usage restrictions on US government customers.
by jjice 1y ago
> It’s worrying to me that Anthropic, a foreign corporation, would even have the visibility necessary to enforce usage restrictions on US government customers.
"Foreign" to who? I interpretted your comment as foreign to the US government (please correct me if I'm wrong) and I was confused because Anthropic is a US company.
- chatmasta 1y agoAh my mistake. I thought they were French. I got them confused with Mistral. The concern remains even if it’s a US corporation though (not government owned servers).
- jjice 1y agoAh yes - Mistral is the largest of the non-US, non-Chinese AI companies that I'm aware of. > The concern remains even if it’s a US corporation though (not government owned servers). Very much so, I completely agree.
- toxik 1y agoAnthropic is pretty clearly using the Häagen-Dasz approach here, call yourself Anthropic and your product Claude so you seem French. Why?
- chatmasta 1y agoHah, it was indeed the Claude name that had me confused :D
- mcintyre1994 1y agoAccording to Claude, it’s named after Claude Shannon, who was American.
- astrange 1y agoBut it might also be the albino alligator in the California Academy of Sciences in SF.
- bt1a 1y agoEveryone spies and abuses individuals' privacy. What difference does it make? (Granted I would agree with you if Anthropic were indeed a foreign based entity, so am I contradicting myself wonderfully?)