Right. The error is in conflating "normal" with "good", or "proper". Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't, sometimes there's no such thing. In fairness, if you

Right. The error is in conflating "normal" with "good", or "proper". Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't, sometimes there's no such thing. In fairness, if you spend a lot of time thinking about these sorts of things, you do need a specific word for "normal in exactly the way I mean", and "non-transsexual" is a piece of work. I was just having fun, and I know that's not really allowed.