4 ms·
Wether she is or not is not for me to decide - at any rate, her analysis seems to have been absolutely spot on if we are now recognizing it is a genocide, isn't
by dmbche 1y ago
Wether she is or not is not for me to decide - at any rate, her analysis seems to have been absolutely spot on if we are now recognizing it is a genocide, isn't it?
And if you think the UN rapporteur is too biased to do their job correctly, why do you care what the UN does?
- dotancohen 1y ago[flagged]
- dmbche 1y ago[flagged]
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> her analysis seems to have been absolutely spot on if we are now recognizing it is a genocide, isn't it? No, no more than someone who predicts a market crash every day is proven right the one time they nail it. The quality and objectivity of the analysis matters. Not just the conclusion.
- dmbche 1y agoShe didn't predict anything, she analysed evidence and arrived to the same conclusion as the ruling you qre recognizing today. Odd you can't reconcile that both parties can be correct
- dotancohen 1y ago> she analysed evidence and arrived to the same conclusion as the ruling you qre recognizing today. No, the UNHCR's conclusion is based on her report. Your argument is circular.
- AuthAuth 1y agoThe evidence didnt exist day 1
- dmbche 1y ago[flagged]
- fahhem 1y agoA market crash is a one-time event. A genocide is ongoing. This would be like someone claiming since 2003 there was a pedo ring in the upper echelons of society and everyone calling them a liar until...