8 ms·
> You later mention "boundaries of bodies" You claimed the mother has authority over the life of the baby, because its body is part of her. I don't think that
by 1718627440 1y ago
> You later mention "boundaries of bodies"
You claimed the mother has authority over the life of the baby, because its body is part of her. I don't think that is true, thus I quoted you a definition for body boundaries.
> There has always been a clash between morality and science. Science always wins.
Weird statement. There is a fight between a compiler and a memory model. The compiler always wins.
You claimed, because it is possible to perform abortion now, it should be moral automatically.
> is dangerous b/c if someone wants to delete your authority they can merely delete you.
Exactly the argument why "deleting" someone is immoral without pointing to religion.
> So you believe the Romans killed Jesus and Peter?
Yes? Palestine was a roman province, so only the procurator could order executions. Petrus was a roman citizen so could demand to be judged by the emperor in Rome, which he did, so he got executed in Rome.
- giardini 1y ago1718627440 sez>You claimed the mother has authority over the life of the baby...< No, I did not. I don't believe in "life" - it's a nonscientific concept. 1718627440 sez> There is a fight between a compiler and a memory model.< There is no "fight": both are present, one completes it's task, neither "wins". 1718627440 sez>"Petrus was a roman citizen..." < and other stuff he read in some text written by religious fanatics thousands of years ago (and randomly amended by other fanatics since).<* "Nothing to see here, move on, move on please,..." - Frank Drebin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSjK2Oqrgic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSjK2Oqrgic
- 1718627440 1y ago> There is no "fight": both are present Same for science and morality. > "life" - it's a nonscientific concept Somebody needs to tell that to biologists. Biology: the study/teaching of living things.