Your second case was in the WD of Texas which is where he was arrested - it's just minutia to have him 'removed' to the ED of Texas to face charges where he was

Your second case was in the WD of Texas which is where he was arrested - it's just minutia to have him 'removed' to the ED of Texas to face charges where he was indicted - this is the main case there: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16517474/united-states-v-rockenhaus/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16517474/united-states-... Here's his plea: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.191485/gov.uscourts.txed.191485.166.0.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.19... My recap is acting up a bit so I'll just copy/paste in case it doesn't grab docket entry 158 - the 'factual basis' for the plea: 1. That the defendant, Conrad Rockenhaus, who is entering a plea of guilty, is the same person charged in the Indictment; 2. That the defendant worked as a as a developer services manager, and later an infrastructure architect, for an online company providing travel booking and vacation services to customers (hereinafter, Victim Company ); 3. That the defendant had access to and could control computer code located on Victim Company s servers throughout the country, including computer code that controlled business functions such as marketing, scheduling, and payment processing; 4. That on or about November 11, 2014, the defendant remotely accessed, without authorization, the Victim Company s servers from his residence in the Eastern District of Texas; 5. That on or about November 11, 2014, the defendant executed a computer code or command that shut down one of Victim Company s servers, which in turn caused several other Victim Company servers to crash; 6. That the defendant was retained by Victim Company to assist with the restoration of Victim Company’s servers; 7. That during the remediation efforts, the defendant, without authorization, disconnected Victim Company’s servers in Plano, Texas, in the Eastern District of Texas, causing further business disruption; 8. That the defendant’s actions cost Victim Company at least $242,775 in lost revenue and at least $321,858 in recovery and remediation costs.