3 ms·
Donald Trump files $15B defamation lawsuit against The New York Times
- duxup 1y agoIt's just one attack after another on free speech that Trump decides should not be heard. We're a lesser country for it.
- sys32768 1y agoNewspapers are free to publish defamatory information, but they cannot do so with impunity if their speech qualifies as libel. So this could also be framed as an abuse of free speech. We'll have to wait to see how the court rules on this case.
- duxup 1y agoThey can't do so if they know that info is incorrect. That's it. They can be wrong for any other reason.
- amradio1989 1y agoCorrect; however, in the internet age it is all too easy to verify information if you are remotely neutral. It would be nearly impossible to be ignorant of facts that contradict a story. Generally, these news publishers are more interested in entertainment than truth telling. They get paid for monetizing attention, not telling the truth. They can’t outright lie, but they are certainly not bound by facts. As the old saying goes, “Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story”. A newsroom mantra if there ever was one. All that to say defamation suits are always a risk. The bar is high, but most “victims” are not rich enough to fight them. Those that are get settlements.
- duxup 1y ago> in the internet age it is all too easy to verify information I have very much found that to not be the case.
- amradio1989 1y agoI suppose we disagree. It requires effort, but I couldn’t call it difficult. What’s your experience? You can pull unprecedented amounts of information about nearly anything. It’s easily accessible. It was not even possible to verify the kind of “facts” we can today, much less at the speed we can do it now.
- maxerickson 1y agoWe can call it stupid without waiting for the court. If the court rules in his favor, we can call that stupid too. Like does it really claim that giving Burnett credit for the Apprentice harms Trump's reputation? Stupid.
- rstuart4133 1y agoYou would only wait if you're patient. Trump loses 93% of cases in court: https://democracyforward.org/updates/trump-loses-93-percent-of-cases-we-know-because-we-win/ https://democracyforward.org/updates/trump-loses-93-percent-...
- bediger4000 1y agoI'm not up on NYT itself: wouldn't $15 billion be an existential threat, if so ordered? Or is this just another shakedown, like the recent CBS and Paramount settlements? Does NYT want to merge, or buy other media?
- duxup 1y agoTrump's legal history long before politics has been to be as aggressive as possible, threaten everyone involved in the process, opposing legal council, judges and so on with his own false claims and so on. In one lawsuit Trump's lawyers claimed opposing lawyers should be removed from a lawsuit because they're sexually attracted to Trump's lawyers.
- rsynnott 1y agoOl' minihands sues a _lot_ of people, but rarely successfully. It would be existential if it was a serious threat with a real case that would hold together, but given the history one could be forgiven for assuming it's just the usual posturing.