3 ms·

By this logic, anyone who has had a Google Pixel and or is running GrapheneOS is guilty by association, right? Just wanted to understand your point.

• IlikeKitties 1y ago
  > By this logic, anyone who has had a Google Pixel and or is running GrapheneOS is guilty by association, right? Yup. https://www.androidauthority.com/google-pixel-organized-crime-preferred-phone-3573578/ https://www.androidauthority.com/google-pixel-organized-crim...
  • Aurornis 1y ago
    The source for that article was a single cop in a single country (Spain) making an off-handed comment. The way it’s been spun as a universal concept in Europe by all of the Android blogs is misleading.
    • axus 1y ago
      Would you predict that GrapheneOS will still be completely legal in 10 years in Spain?
      • Aurornis 1y ago
        Yes. I think that one comment was a flash in the pan about a particular moment in time from an officer involved in a very specific type of drug trafficking prosecutions.
• alberth 1y ago
  There's a big difference between being the user of something (Pixel/GrapheneOS, though I find these as weird comparisons given) and being an operator of something. Operating an exit node is by definition you acting in the distribution of such activity (legal or not).