3 ms·
> Digital also beats the pants off film for dynamic range and low light. While this is true now, it took a surprisingly long time to get there. The dynamic ran
by thw_9a83c 1y ago
> Digital also beats the pants off film for dynamic range and low light.
While this is true now, it took a surprisingly long time to get there. The dynamic range of professional medium format negative films is still respectable. Perhaps not so much in a low light, but it's very immune to overexposure.
Also, you can buy a cheap medium-format camera in a good condition and experience that "huge sensor" effect, but unfortunately there are no inexpensive 6x6 digital cameras.
- buildbot 1y agoIn fact there is basically only one digital back ever made at that size, the dicomed bigshot.
- thw_9a83c 1y agoInteresting. I didn't even know that. I had to look up what's the size of the modern Hasselblad digital camera sensor, and it 43.8 × 32.9mm.
- buildbot 1y agoIt’s incredibly rare and specific, many people in the DB world don’t even know about them. 60x60mm sensor, larger than the actual film gate of 56x56mm There was also a version for the Rollei 6x6 6000 series, the Rollei Q16. I’ve only seen one for sale ever. Technically larger than 6x6 film sensors have existed since the 80s or 90s at least but are typically only used for government things… Some digital aerial systems use huge sensors.