3 ms·

This pattern isn't OOP, there is no objects here. And Java generally isn't a good example of an OO language to me. It's more like Class Oriented Programming. Th

by fhd2 1y ago

This pattern isn't OOP, there is no objects here. And Java generally isn't a good example of an OO language to me. It's more like Class Oriented Programming. That is mighty flawed but was for some reason quite fashionable. I wouldn't consider OO the way Ruby and other actually well designed languages do it flawed.

cies 1y ago
And Ruby is basically Smalltalk with a friendly syntax and lots of FP-goodness where it makes sense. Or, Ruby is a cute (mostly subset of) Perl. And after some Kotlin I must say: Kotlin is an acceptable "Ruby with static types".