4 ms·
Also react in particular in combination with tailwind seems to be easier for LLMs to generate. Probably due to the condensed syntax, no split between code, css
by chvid 1y ago
Also react in particular in combination with tailwind seems to be easier for LLMs to generate. Probably due to the condensed syntax, no split between code, css and html, plus the color naming scheme of tailwind.
- Jolter 1y agoProbably due to the extremely large amounts of React code in the training data set, not due to any inherent advantage of the framework. LLM coding will lead to stagnation in languages and frameworks as developers start considering how competent their favorite agent is in each domain.
- chrismorgan 1y agoLLMs favour React and Tailwind because they’re popular, so they’ve seen a lot of them, not because of technical merit. This is the very manifestation of React winning by default and slowing innovation.
- DimmieMan 1y agoGiven the quality of some of that combo I’ve seen vomited out, it’s technical dismerit. I wonder if you’re better off with something critical mass enough that an LLM can correctly write it at all but not trained on mountains and mountains of slop.
- calderwoodra 1y agoThis has been an interesting realization for me, seeing the LLM well poisoned by its poor understanding of hooks and effects has opened my eyes up to how much the average developer also doesn't understand these things.
- icedchai 1y agoI'm terrible at CSS and have been generating HTML/CSS prototypes with Claude. It really knows how to push out tailwind.