3 ms·

We have both asked for examples of how countries guarantee safe delivery without any chemical treatment (chlorine, ozone, etc). You have provided nothing.

BoredPositron 1y ago
You are both simply ignorant. How hard would it have been to Google it yourself? You had all the context you needed. Now I will get comments that it's not a good enough source blurb. There are countries that have fixed the exact problem you are pondering about. At first we talked about chlorine now about pipes... keep kicking the ball. It's still a governance problem. https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/topics/drinking-water.html https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/topics/drinki... https://www.blog.foma.net/en/brass-and-drinking-water-the-regulatory-roadmap-to-2032?utm_source=perplexity https://www.blog.foma.net/en/brass-and-drinking-water-the-re...
- dylan604 1y ago
  > https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/topics/drinki https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/topics/drinki... "Additionally, to protect vulnerable population groups, especially pregnant persons, babies and young children, the last remnants of lead pipes that were installed more than 50 years ago are to be removed from house connection pipes or domestic distribution systems by 2026 unless already done" So in the mean time, because you refuse to have an in home filtration system, enjoy the free lead additives until your government gets around to your pipes. Or, use an in-home system and enjoy unleaded water now. If you can't understand that, then you are just being willfully ignorant yourself
  - BoredPositron 1y ago
    It's under 1% you little cherry picker. The people that are living with these pipes are also getting notified and a filter in their homes from their municipality. You could have found that in the same report/website. Get over it and admit that other countries have figured out how to protect their citizens without putting the burden on the individual. Can't wait for the next aKsChuAlLy.

BoredPositron 1y ago

You are both simply ignorant. How hard would it have been to Google it yourself? You had all the context you needed. Now I will get comments that it's not a good enough source blurb. There are countries that have fixed the exact problem you are pondering about. At first we talked about chlorine now about pipes... keep kicking the ball. It's still a governance problem. https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/topics/drinking-water.html https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/topics/drinki... https://www.blog.foma.net/en/brass-and-drinking-water-the-regulatory-roadmap-to-2032?utm_source=perplexity https://www.blog.foma.net/en/brass-and-drinking-water-the-re...

dylan604 1y ago
> https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/topics/drinki https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/topics/drinki... "Additionally, to protect vulnerable population groups, especially pregnant persons, babies and young children, the last remnants of lead pipes that were installed more than 50 years ago are to be removed from house connection pipes or domestic distribution systems by 2026 unless already done" So in the mean time, because you refuse to have an in home filtration system, enjoy the free lead additives until your government gets around to your pipes. Or, use an in-home system and enjoy unleaded water now. If you can't understand that, then you are just being willfully ignorant yourself
- BoredPositron 1y ago
  It's under 1% you little cherry picker. The people that are living with these pipes are also getting notified and a filter in their homes from their municipality. You could have found that in the same report/website. Get over it and admit that other countries have figured out how to protect their citizens without putting the burden on the individual. Can't wait for the next aKsChuAlLy.