2 ms·

As far as I can see, there's nothing there mentioning people accusing others of being 'not fascist enough'. Also, you said 'violent enemies', but I can't see th

• ImPostingOnHN 1y ago
  Interesting! I and many others have read the exact same sections and come to the opposite conclusion: that the sections do indeed describe multiple feuds with a violent group that felt that Charlie wasn't fascist enough Just in case everybody except you is mistaken, I asked an impartial LLM, who confirmed the matter: https://chatgpt.com/share/68c8802c-7b64-800a-8452-bd18992088cf https://chatgpt.com/share/68c8802c-7b64-800a-8452-bd18992088... (Obviously they don't use those exact terms, so I hope you're not hung up on a lack of a quote saying verbatim "we are fascist and you aren't fascist enough" or "we hereby announce that we are violent", please let me know if you are fixated upon this) Like I said, we shouldn't speculate on motive, because we can see there is at least as much there as anywhere else. Anyhow, why do you think your conclusion is so opposite others'?
  • HKH2 1y ago
    "violent enemies" implies they were willing to do violence against him. Where's the evidence of that?
    • ImPostingOnHN 1y ago
      "violent enemy" means any person (in this case, any organization) which both: 1. is an enemy, and 2. is violent (has ever been shown to have attitudes, inclinations, tendencies, or propensity towards violence [towards anyone or anything])