5 ms·
> You think because that obvious fact is true it completely eliminates genetics? No. The claim is not that genetics has nothing to do with intelligence. The cl
by jncfhnb 1y ago
> You think because that obvious fact is true it completely eliminates genetics? No.
The claim is not that genetics has nothing to do with intelligence. The claim is that race is a material, important driver of intelligence. There is no rigorous evidence of this.
- ninetyninenine 1y agoThe phrase you are responding to is 100 percent saying environmental factors does not eliminate genetic factors as a driver of intelligence. The English in context does not imply anything else. Please read what I wrote and respond to what I wrote and don’t make random assumptions.
- jncfhnb 1y agoSorry I assumed you understood the context of the conversation you were inserting yourself into
- ninetyninenine 1y agoYou inserted yourself into my context. I brought the topic up and you responded. Don’t apologize to me if it’s fake. Additionally Please try to follow what’s actually going on instead of making stuff up.
- jncfhnb 1y agoMy dude you’re pivoting to try and argue that there are differences, even if the differences are immaterial and even if there’s no statistical evidence to support your claim. I don’t give a shit if you believe yourself to be part of the (immaterially) superior race.
- ninetyninenine 1y agoThere's no statistical evidence to support your claim either. It's not about race, it's about facts. Like I said in another comment, Jewish people have the highest measurable average IQ, and they are "White". I think you should walk away. You brought racism into the conversation while I'm just arguing facts. I never made a claim asians were "superior" and I'm NOT from an asian country with the highest IQ either.
- jncfhnb 1y ago[flagged]
- ninetyninenine 1y ago[flagged]