>claims to refute the whole discipline based on a single incorrect prediction I'm not so sure about "incorrect" even. The retrospectives have been generally po

>claims to refute the whole discipline based on a single incorrect prediction I'm not so sure about "incorrect" even. The retrospectives have been generally positive.[0][1] Citing economic growth as a counterexample is pretty silly, because in the Limits models many parameters look great right up until the collapse.[2] I would encourage everyone to see how the original authors describe their findings[2][3], rather than (potentially motivated) retellings. [0] https://www.livescience.com/collapse-human-society-limits-to-growth.html https://www.livescience.com/collapse-human-society-limits-to... [1] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/02/limits-to-growth-was-right-new-research-shows-were-nearing-collapse https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/02/limits... [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhSpzQhvFS8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhSpzQhvFS8 [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pc3SWj-hjTE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pc3SWj-hjTE