They're more than relevant. They're the central problem in nativist approaches to ML. AI is completely false technology unless it is diagnostic or specific. It

They're more than relevant. They're the central problem in nativist approaches to ML. AI is completely false technology unless it is diagnostic or specific. It has no value as text prediction, it's simply here to demonstrate language is dead technology. This is empirically valid. LLMs prove this by demonstration. Thaye cannot be trained or aligned as language cannot exclude its dark matter. I see no responses from engineers disproving this. Clearly you're unable to debate this. Please someone who can counter this should step in here to debate how language's dark matter can be extricated to make chat viable. I've studied this since 2001 from game development, my team and I see no other way than to ban Chat or to develop a next-gen language.