3 ms·
It was redacted ... and very obviously so. Did you read my post?
by Quekid5 1y ago
It was redacted ... and very obviously so. Did you read my post?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- JumpCrisscross 1y agoAttendees can hint at money. But it isn’t money. The lack of transparency is problematic per se. But it doesn’t advance your argument that the redacted groups are the ones you suspect.
- Quekid5 1y agoI take your point. There were some previous leaked docs about Thorn involvement (I'm pretty sure Palantir was mentioned in those docs, but not 100% sure), so yeah... The biggest issue is the lack of transparency about the people/groups involved in those meetings and why this ineffectual privacy-destroying idiocy gets pushed so hard.