3 ms·
That’s your interpretation. When I read the title I thought about positive case [ChatGPT saved my life], not the negative one.
by wiseowise 1y ago
That’s your interpretation.
When I read the title I thought about positive case [ChatGPT saved my life], not the negative one.
- weikju 1y agoSame here. It's very similar to a lot of the "Apple Watch saved my life" stories/headlines.
- mrjay42 1y agoAsking about the logic here: this is a form of fallacy...kinda? His "interpretation" or guess, wasn't worse or better than yours. Therefore, his statement about a misleading title is not invalidated because you guessed in the opposite direction. Let's say Hypothesis 1 Article is negative (ChatGPT gave bad medical advice and that led to the E.R.) Then * His guess -> is correct * Your guess -> is wrong Hypothesis 2 Article is positive Then * His guess -> is wrong * Your guess -> is correct Conclusion: In any case you had NO way to know beforehand So, in what ways pointing out that this is "his interpretation" invalidates anything he said? Of course, it is his guess and based on the title alone, it's at least an equally valid guess as yours. I say "at least", because it's not unreasonable to think that an LLM might have hallucinated some medical advice and that could lead someone to have an unhealthy practice which led them to the E.R.
- zahlman 1y ago> That’s your interpretation. It's the ordinary understanding of the idiom.