9 ms·
You're essentially encouraging people to give up and leave it broken. Sure, a lot of code changes need to happen, but they only need to happen once. There's no
by nitwit005 1y ago
You're essentially encouraging people to give up and leave it broken.
Sure, a lot of code changes need to happen, but they only need to happen once. There's no real reason to discourage people from stepping closer to the end goal.
- antisol 1y ago> leave it broken The whole point here is that on X it's not broken at all. And if it was, it would only need to be fixed once.
- yjftsjthsd-h 1y agoLike... I don't exactly want to discourage people. As a person using a11y tools that don't yet exist on Wayland, I would kinda like to be able to migrate over. But it remains true that Wayland is set up in such a way that it's inherently a longer uphill struggle, and always will be. If tomorrow someone created a new X11 window manager, I could switch and my tools would still work. If tomorrow someone created a new Wayland compositor, I almost certainly couldn't use it, because they'd need to implement everything over again. They can do that, obviously, but the startup effort will always be higher.