> arbitrary interference with privacy So if it's non-arbitrary, but systematic and consistent then anything goes? The linked article has a great anachronism p

> arbitrary interference with privacy So if it's non-arbitrary, but systematic and consistent then anything goes? The linked article has a great anachronism providing protections against > attacks upon his honor and reputation haha > the ability of one to remove themselves or information about themselves from the public This is completely divorced from reality.. This is pure fantasy in the digital age...