4 ms·
The 1st amendment doesn't protect your job, never has.
by sointeresting 1y ago
The 1st amendment doesn't protect your job, never has.
- platevoltage 1y agoThis is exactly right. People get fired over social media posts all of the time. The 1st amendment absolutely gives people the right to boycott these employers if they see fit though.
- lostlogin 1y agoDo you mean ‘The 1st amendment absolutely gives people the right to boycott these employees if they see fit’. Sorry, I’m not American so have little idea how it works.
- platevoltage 1y agoNo, I meant what I said. I also did not agree against the legality of being fired for a social media post. It's been happening since social media first existed. You also can't boycott an employee. I really don't know what point you are trying to make here.
- lostlogin 1y agoI’m not trying to make a point. I was trying to understand if it’s legal to sack someone in the US if you don’t like their views and I didn’t read your comment carefully enough.
- platevoltage 1y agoNo, you can't fire someone for their views. That's 100% illegal, but given the track record of our current Supreme Court, I don't see that being the case for long.
- delichon 1y agoYes, in general a private employer can legally fire an employee for their political views. There are exceptions in some states, including California, New York, Colorado, North Dakota, that have protections for firing by political affiliation or activities, but that's the exception to the rule. Another exception applies to any public employee, since the first amendment applies to their employer. The default employment rule is at-will, meaning someone can be fired for any reason not explicitly prohibited. Political affiliation is not a federally protected category.
- platevoltage 1y agoI guess I've been living in a free state for so long that I overlooked this fact.
- zahlman 1y ago> The default employment rule is at-will employment, meaning someone can be fired for any reason not explicitly prohibited. Even then, in practice they can fire people for prohibited reasons, as long as it can't be proven that those reasons were used. Which in practice could be very difficult.
- RickJWagner 1y ago[flagged]
- xethos 1y agoIf you work for the government, shouldn't it?