3 ms·
> For this to be true they would have to throw away labeled training data. That's how validation works.
by yobbo 1y ago
> For this to be true they would have to throw away labeled training data.
That's how validation works.
- jfengel 1y agoIs there a reason not to use validation data in your next round of training data? Or is it more efficient to reuse validation and instead get more training data?
- parineum 1y agoYou'd have to recreate your validation if you trained your model on it every iteration and then they wouldn't be consistent enough to show any trends
- jfengel 1y agoI'd have thought that if you kept the same validation you'd risk over fitting. Clearly that does make it hard to measure. I'd think you'd want "equivalent" validation (like changing the SATs every year), though I imagine that's not really a meaningful concept.