4 ms·

Bolsonaro is a confessed defendant, of course we all knew he would be sentenced.

matheusmoreira 1y ago
Please. The entire case against Lula and his fellow corrupt communists was thrown out on infinitely lesser technicalities than the circus we just witnessed. His "confession" merely entails "discussion of judicial means of stopping the election". Yes, "judicial" means. He sought to use article 142 of the constitution which says the purpose of the armed forces is to "guarantee the constitutional powers". Bring order and restore harmony between the legislative, executive and judiciary branches of government. Total break down of harmony and order between the three powers is the exact state of affairs we currently find ourselves in. Surely you do not believe otherwise? Because discussion can't move forward if you believe otherwise.
- brazukadev 1y ago
  The way you think is exactly how he thought. He is a radical extremist that is now under arrest, probably regretting his attempts.
  - matheusmoreira 1y ago
    Yeah, looks like you believe this country is a democracy. That implies you're willingly ignoring all the logical arguments presented to you that show that it's not. If I'm so wrong about everything, why not simply refute the points that were made? Should be easy. "Radical extremists" are just people who happen to have self-consistent philosophies and world views. It doesn't matter how "extreme" the conclusion is, so long as it's the right conclusion. If realizing the truth about things makes me an "radical extremist", then by all means.
    - brazukadev 1y ago
      > Yeah, looks like you believe this country is a democracy. I'm sure it is. It seems you were fine with a dictator but you did not got what you wished for. > why not simply refute the points that were made? Your arguments are so nonsense that any person discussing them with you are just giving you their approve. I don't argue with insane people and I support putting them in jail when they flock together to help overthrow elections.
      - matheusmoreira 1y ago
        You don't argue because you don't have arguments. You cannot deny the abuses of the supreme court, so you ignore them. They're persecuting the people you hate so it's all fine. You have stooped to insults and baseless accusations. As such, I don't plan to continue this thread.
        brazukadev 1y ago
        > You don't argue because you don't have arguments. You cannot deny the abuses of the supreme court, so you ignore them. They're persecuting the people you hate so it's all fine. You really get the impression that people that don't engage with your crazy theories don't have arguments? You must be fun at parties.

Please. The entire case against Lula and his fellow corrupt communists was thrown out on infinitely lesser technicalities than the circus we just witnessed. His "confession" merely entails "discussion of judicial means of stopping the election". Yes, "judicial" means. He sought to use article 142 of the constitution which says the purpose of the armed forces is to "guarantee the constitutional powers". Bring order and restore harmony between the legislative, executive and judiciary branches of government. Total break down of harmony and order between the three powers is the exact state of affairs we currently find ourselves in. Surely you do not believe otherwise? Because discussion can't move forward if you believe otherwise.

brazukadev 1y ago
The way you think is exactly how he thought. He is a radical extremist that is now under arrest, probably regretting his attempts.
- matheusmoreira 1y ago
  Yeah, looks like you believe this country is a democracy. That implies you're willingly ignoring all the logical arguments presented to you that show that it's not. If I'm so wrong about everything, why not simply refute the points that were made? Should be easy. "Radical extremists" are just people who happen to have self-consistent philosophies and world views. It doesn't matter how "extreme" the conclusion is, so long as it's the right conclusion. If realizing the truth about things makes me an "radical extremist", then by all means.
  - brazukadev 1y ago
    > Yeah, looks like you believe this country is a democracy. I'm sure it is. It seems you were fine with a dictator but you did not got what you wished for. > why not simply refute the points that were made? Your arguments are so nonsense that any person discussing them with you are just giving you their approve. I don't argue with insane people and I support putting them in jail when they flock together to help overthrow elections.
    - matheusmoreira 1y ago
      You don't argue because you don't have arguments. You cannot deny the abuses of the supreme court, so you ignore them. They're persecuting the people you hate so it's all fine. You have stooped to insults and baseless accusations. As such, I don't plan to continue this thread.
      - brazukadev 1y ago
        > You don't argue because you don't have arguments. You cannot deny the abuses of the supreme court, so you ignore them. They're persecuting the people you hate so it's all fine. You really get the impression that people that don't engage with your crazy theories don't have arguments? You must be fun at parties.