3 ms·
> Companies want to hire them in addition to U.S. citizens. That's it. As opposed to the rest of the graduating class that is already considered a legal citize
by dgfitz 1y ago
> Companies want to hire them in addition to U.S. citizens. That's it.
As opposed to the rest of the graduating class that is already considered a legal citizen?
Your logic doesn’t make sense. “In addition to every option available that doesn’t have additional legal framework attached, these specific people are also desirable.”
Why?
- kccqzy 1y agoIn addition to the U.S. citizens in that graduating class. Basically large tech companies want to hire whomever passes their interviews, regardless of whether they are citizens or not. The hiring process is intentionally blind on their immigration status. Small companies will ask you in the application form "will you now or in the future require sponsorship to work in the U.S." and larger companies simply don't ask.
- dgfitz 1y ago> The hiring process is intentionally blind on their immigration status. This might be the most amusing thing I’ve read all day.
- justanotherday9 1y ago[flagged]
- ajcp 1y ago> The hiring process is intentionally blind on their immigration status. You can't be serious. On every job application I've ever filled out the last question is always a variation of: "Do you now or will you in the future require employer sponsorship to work in this country?"