4 ms·
It would be a powerful enough weapon if the target of the patent infringement case did not have crazy deep pockets. The costs of defending a winning case can be
by Eddy_Viscosity2 1y ago
It would be a powerful enough weapon if the target of the patent infringement case did not have crazy deep pockets. The costs of defending a winning case can be more than small game developer could hope to afford.
- Atlas667 1y agoYou got it. Copyright is about defending monopolization, not just about creative rights and ensuring attribution. Copyright is an artificial system propping up huge sections of the economy/whole industries. It's internal protectionism at best and hindering progress at worse. Nothing "free market" about it.