3 ms·

>but intent supersedes interpretation so dont worry about what i wrote, whats important was what i was thinking? fair enough If market value is the instrinsic

>but intent supersedes interpretation so dont worry about what i wrote, whats important was what i was thinking? fair enough If market value is the instrinsic value, how could two separate markets get different prices for the same asset? edit: https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices/methodologies/consumerpriceinflationincludesall3indicescpihcpiandrpiqmi#methodology-background https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices/meth... methodology states it is based on prices quoted

9rx 1y ago
> If market value is the instrinsic value, how could two separate markets get different prices for the same asset? Much like, returning to our analogy, how the same distance can be different depending on the observer's frame of reference. > methodology states it is based on prices quoted And now read the rest. For "consumer goods and services purchased".