4 ms·

> US is number one or two in immigration from 3rd world countries This is good, because over the last 150 years, immigrants have been found to be significantly

> US is number one or two in immigration from 3rd world countries This is good, because over the last 150 years, immigrants have been found to be significantly less likely to commit crimes than the U.S.-born [1] [2] [3]. > It has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world, and one of the lowest murder rates in the world. I didn't deny that poverty is a factor. That's why I compared US with UK, where average poverty numbers are very close to each other. Also, Utah’s rate is low for the U.S. but still higher than many countries globally [4]. [1] https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2024/03/immigrants-are-significantly-less-likely-to-commit-crimes-than-the-us-born/ https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2024/03/immigrants-are... [2] https://www.nber.org/papers/w31440 https://www.nber.org/papers/w31440 [3] https://www.cato.org/blog/illegal-immigrants-have-low-homicide-conviction-rate-setting-record-straight-illegal-immigrant https://www.cato.org/blog/illegal-immigrants-have-low-homici... [4] https://ibis.utah.gov/epht-view/indicator/important_facts/Homicide.html https://ibis.utah.gov/epht-view/indicator/important_facts/Ho...

trimethylpurine 1y ago
I wrote "third world." You've given irrelevant data. Hopefully by accident because I'd like to believe your arguments are made in good faith. Find stats for third world immigrants to make your point. I'll fast forward the conversation for you, country of origin is statistically very significant. Just like you, I don't like that this is true. But fixing problems requires honesty and objectivity. Hiding problems with bs stats isn't going to help anyone. That's how we got here.
- selcuka 1y ago
  > You've given irrelevant data In fact, calling it "irrelevant" is pushing the boundaries of good faith. It definitely includes "third world" immigrants, too. Apparently we haven't been able to find any statistical significance of the country of origin [1]: > According to the study, this is the case for almost every region in the world that is a major source of immigrants to the United States. As of 2019, immigrants from China and eastern and southern Europe were committing the fewest number of crimes — as measured by incarceration rates — relative to U.S.-born individuals. The exception is Mexican and Central American immigrants, but their incarceration rates are similar to, not _higher_ than U.S.-born individuals: > The exception is Mexican and Central American immigrants, [...] Incarceration rates among Mexican and Central American immigrants were similar to those of U.S.-born individuals between 1980 and 2005. > Hiding problems with bs stats isn't going to help anyone. You've given no data at all. As it stands, everything you posted are your personal opinions. [1] https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/mythical-tie-between-immigration-and-crime https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/mythical-tie-between-immigra...
  - trimethylpurine 1y ago
    You've now given data that makes my argument. I don't need to provide citation where we're talking about your data. What more do you need here? Immigration from third world countries increases crime and murder, having nothing to do with guns. The previous data you gave tries to make the opposite point by including immigrants that aren't from third world countries, I.e. irrelevant. You for sure see how that's bad faith and I'm not going to entertain further discussion if you won't sustain that you're in the wrong for doing that. You've also summarized the data with an interpretation that isn't honest to the numbers. That last part absolutely ends the discussion for me. I'm interested in science not politics.
    - selcuka 1y ago
      You are clearly reading the data incorrectly. It says that immigration (third world or not) reduces the crime and murder rate. U.S.-born citizens are more prone to incarceration.
      - trimethylpurine 1y ago
        You're including unrelated immigrants to wash your data. The question is on third world immigrants ONLY. Otherwise you can say things like guns don't have bullets because we looked at "things that kill" and most of them don't. That's obviously not a good way to answer questions. Try talking with an expert or get help from someone to understand why we don't use statistics like that to make business or medical decisions. I hope you have an easy time figuring it out. Good luck.
        selcuka 1y ago
        > According to the study, this is the case for almost every region in the world that is a major source of immigrants to the United States.
        trimethylpurine 1y ago

trimethylpurine 1y ago

I wrote "third world." You've given irrelevant data. Hopefully by accident because I'd like to believe your arguments are made in good faith. Find stats for third world immigrants to make your point. I'll fast forward the conversation for you, country of origin is statistically very significant. Just like you, I don't like that this is true. But fixing problems requires honesty and objectivity. Hiding problems with bs stats isn't going to help anyone. That's how we got here.

selcuka 1y ago
> You've given irrelevant data In fact, calling it "irrelevant" is pushing the boundaries of good faith. It definitely includes "third world" immigrants, too. Apparently we haven't been able to find any statistical significance of the country of origin [1]: > According to the study, this is the case for almost every region in the world that is a major source of immigrants to the United States. As of 2019, immigrants from China and eastern and southern Europe were committing the fewest number of crimes — as measured by incarceration rates — relative to U.S.-born individuals. The exception is Mexican and Central American immigrants, but their incarceration rates are similar to, not _higher_ than U.S.-born individuals: > The exception is Mexican and Central American immigrants, [...] Incarceration rates among Mexican and Central American immigrants were similar to those of U.S.-born individuals between 1980 and 2005. > Hiding problems with bs stats isn't going to help anyone. You've given no data at all. As it stands, everything you posted are your personal opinions. [1] https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/mythical-tie-between-immigration-and-crime https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/mythical-tie-between-immigra...
- trimethylpurine 1y ago
  You've now given data that makes my argument. I don't need to provide citation where we're talking about your data. What more do you need here? Immigration from third world countries increases crime and murder, having nothing to do with guns. The previous data you gave tries to make the opposite point by including immigrants that aren't from third world countries, I.e. irrelevant. You for sure see how that's bad faith and I'm not going to entertain further discussion if you won't sustain that you're in the wrong for doing that. You've also summarized the data with an interpretation that isn't honest to the numbers. That last part absolutely ends the discussion for me. I'm interested in science not politics.
  - selcuka 1y ago
    You are clearly reading the data incorrectly. It says that immigration (third world or not) reduces the crime and murder rate. U.S.-born citizens are more prone to incarceration.
    - trimethylpurine 1y ago
      You're including unrelated immigrants to wash your data. The question is on third world immigrants ONLY. Otherwise you can say things like guns don't have bullets because we looked at "things that kill" and most of them don't. That's obviously not a good way to answer questions. Try talking with an expert or get help from someone to understand why we don't use statistics like that to make business or medical decisions. I hope you have an easy time figuring it out. Good luck.
      - selcuka 1y ago
        > According to the study, this is the case for almost every region in the world that is a major source of immigrants to the United States.
        trimethylpurine 1y ago