The skepticism from your end is very understandable. But human brain is made of approximately 86 billion of those pretty little boxes (neurons) of electrical im

The skepticism from your end is very understandable. But human brain is made of approximately 86 billion of those pretty little boxes (neurons) of electrical impulses, all governed by same fundamental principles. whether, you have 100 pretty boxes, trillion boxes, the rules remain the same. The real magic is to understand those rules and simulate them using lines of code. Thinking, feeling or experiencing are higher cognitive functions resulting from the interactions of those pretty little boxes. And obviously to get to these cognitive functions, you need more boxes. That's totally fair. But even at small scale, if those rules are correct, you will start seeing early signs which will mature into cognitive functions you are referencing. Think of a development of newborn into an adult. So if you get the rules right, it is completely justified calling it an artificial brain. A toy car is essentially also a car, both governed by same laws of motion. The logic and definition of the use of words(spin) is formally defined in the report. I hope this clarifies some of the skepticism.