3 ms·
That's true, but that would be a huge signal of a rejection. What's more - changing such law would be slightly more complex than just introducing the backdor IM
by ktosobcy 1y ago
That's true, but that would be a huge signal of a rejection. What's more - changing such law would be slightly more complex than just introducing the backdor IMHO.
- arlort 1y ago> would be slightly more complex than just introducing the backdor Not really, both things need to be done by a law. So it's the same signal and complexity as just rejecting the law when it's proposed And the second option at least does away with the pretension of permanence people like to use as an excuse to wash their hands of interest in politics