4 ms·
Ask HN: How do you stay on top of new research?
I used to use Karpathy's gret arxiv-sanity.com but it now redirects to a paid product (undermind.ai). It's been a while since I've tried to read new research papers on a daily/weekly basis. How do others stay on top of new research papers?
- toomuchtodo 1y agoI created a custom feed of research links ingested from HN, Bluesky, and Reddit subreddits firehoses that meet url regex criteria (DOIs or paper repo TLDs) that funnel into karakeep.app for reading at my convenience. Firehose->folder. (i would also ingest twitter/x firehose, but the access story is meh, alas)
- bjourne 1y agoYou can't. 10k articles are published daily. It's doubtful you'll have time to even download them all.
- brudgers 1y agoAgreed and Fomo is an aspect of youth. Getting older is in part coming to terms with the reality that we missed out on approximately everything…the realization that we were mistaken when we thought we were keeping up.
- Blackstrat 1y agoAnd it only gets worse once you retire. In some cases, I go back to interests abandoned in the past, so I could pursue the almighty dollar. In reality, I use HN as a curator of things that might be interesting to read or study. Of late, the AI fad seems to have blotted out a lot of the subject diversity, though I only skim the first 120-150 “new” entries, though occasionally I use the search feature for specific subjects. I have uses several of the others like Stack Exchange, Quora, Reddit, et al, though I prefer HN unless I’m looking for a lot of opinions on specific topics, e.g. best textbook on subject X.
- barrenko 1y agoSimilar to a rule from zombie movies - Fight only when you absolutely must, run when you can. 'Fight' meaning reading a paper.
- yorwba 1y agoYou can use undermind.ai on the free plan. I made two searches when they launched and still occasionally get updates with new relevant papers. Unfortunately, those papers are typically only new and relevant, but not novel. (Not a knock against the search quality. In an area where data acquisition is expensive, everyone working with the same handful of small datasets is probably unavoidable.) But the initial searches surfaces some old papers I had missed, so I'd say it's worth a try.
- bilsbie 1y agoI try to keep a curated list of researchers on x.com.
- softwaredoug 1y agoThe only way I know how is to see what research gets mentioned by 2 or more people I respect. Then I might check it out. But there's a lot of bad ML research out there, my default is to ignore it.
- dv_dt 1y agogoogle scholar and alerts for references to a curated author list