3 ms·

Why?

by sammy2255 1y ago

Why?

thinkingtoilet 1y ago
Sigh...
Simulacra 1y ago
Antisemitism
- clot27 1y ago
  give up bro, no one buy this anymore.
  - ajay-b 1y ago
    [flagged]
    - clot27 1y ago
      wdym
noboostforyou 1y ago
Do you consider genocide a bad thing? https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/israel-gaza-war-children-death-toll/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/israel...
danbruc 1y ago
Because the goal of the Zionists has always been to conquer all of Palestine and the State of Israel has been following those foot steps since day one. From the river to the sea. This has been declared illegal under international law more than half a century ago but Israel does not care about the law. Therefore Israel should be forced to comply, which means boycotts and sanctions or military force. And we should probably try boycotts and sanctions first before we send tanks. Which is unlikely to happen any time soon anyway as that would mean opposing the USA and we have seen in recent history what happens to people and countries supporting the Palestinians.
- stopthebullshit 1y ago
  [flagged]
- danbruc 1y ago
  To the dead comment Israel agreed to the UN partition in 1947, and then Arabs started a war to kill all the Jews there. You do not even understand what the UN general assembly does, it expresses majority opinions, it does not make legally binding decisions. That means the UN partition plan is only what a majority considered the best solution, not a legal decisions to divide Palestine. And the Palestinians vehemently opposed that solution and later violently its implementation. And should one really be surprised that the Arab neighbors attacked Israel? The Jews had just occupied half of the Palestinian land, violently displaced hundred thousands of Palestinians, and established their own state on Palestinian land.
  - Belopolye 1y ago
    It's a simple question in my eyes. Do people indigenous to a land have the right to defend their lives and property from a foreign, occupying force with violence, if necessary? It's a shame that one's answer to this question is entirely dependent upon a bronze-age claim.

Why?

thinkingtoilet 1y ago

Sigh...

Simulacra 1y ago

Antisemitism

clot27 1y ago
give up bro, no one buy this anymore.
- ajay-b 1y ago
  [flagged]
  - clot27 1y ago
    wdym

noboostforyou 1y ago

Do you consider genocide a bad thing? https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/israel-gaza-war-children-death-toll/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/israel...

danbruc 1y ago

Because the goal of the Zionists has always been to conquer all of Palestine and the State of Israel has been following those foot steps since day one. From the river to the sea. This has been declared illegal under international law more than half a century ago but Israel does not care about the law. Therefore Israel should be forced to comply, which means boycotts and sanctions or military force. And we should probably try boycotts and sanctions first before we send tanks. Which is unlikely to happen any time soon anyway as that would mean opposing the USA and we have seen in recent history what happens to people and countries supporting the Palestinians.

stopthebullshit 1y ago
[flagged]
danbruc 1y ago
To the dead comment Israel agreed to the UN partition in 1947, and then Arabs started a war to kill all the Jews there. You do not even understand what the UN general assembly does, it expresses majority opinions, it does not make legally binding decisions. That means the UN partition plan is only what a majority considered the best solution, not a legal decisions to divide Palestine. And the Palestinians vehemently opposed that solution and later violently its implementation. And should one really be surprised that the Arab neighbors attacked Israel? The Jews had just occupied half of the Palestinian land, violently displaced hundred thousands of Palestinians, and established their own state on Palestinian land.
- Belopolye 1y ago
  It's a simple question in my eyes. Do people indigenous to a land have the right to defend their lives and property from a foreign, occupying force with violence, if necessary? It's a shame that one's answer to this question is entirely dependent upon a bronze-age claim.