Odd, the Economist is usually rather intelligent. Apple doesn't need great leaps forward, that was the first iPhone. "Steady as she goes" is now good enough. Th

Odd, the Economist is usually rather intelligent. Apple doesn't need great leaps forward, that was the first iPhone. "Steady as she goes" is now good enough. They mainly need to convince those whose contracts are expiring to renew their vows and show those without iPhones just how much they are missing The "competition" is in no danger of catching up with the overall package no matter how hard they try to mimic and copy, so why squander advances?