Does it really make any difference whether they compared the death of someone who led one of the world’s largest terrorist organisations for decades - with som

Does it really make any difference whether they compared the death of someone who led one of the world’s largest terrorist organisations for decades - with someone who wasn’t good at debates, - or with someone who was? My point still stands: even if Charlie Kirk had been entirely unremarkable, it wouldn’t be right to compare him with someone responsible for thousands of civilian deaths?